Quick Links
-
NATSO Analysis: RIN Market Volatility Driven By Policy...
-
Sales of EVs Grow, Diesel to Remain Dominant
-
Truckstop Operators Prepare for the Vehicles and Customers of the...
-
Executives Explore Changing Driver Needs
-
Regulatory, Legislative Decisions Shape Operators’ Future
-
NATSO Connect Kicks Off in Orlando
-
Retailers Work to Maintain Relevant Value Proposition
-
NATSO 2019 Chairman Welcomes Operators, Industry Supplier to Orlando
-
First House Transportation Hearing Addresses Infrastructure...
-
NATSO, Allies Urge Congress to Support Off-Highway Businesses by...
-
Arkansas Mandates Human Trafficking Awareness Training for Truck...
-
States Pursue Rest Area Commercialization
-
N.C. Unveils Electric Vehicle Charging Station at Rest Area
-
Ceridian-UCLA PCI Rose 0.2% in December
-
The NATSO Show Features Innovations from Around the World and The...
-
New York Assembly Re-introduces "Jason's Law"
-
NATSO Analysis: RIN Market Volatility Driven By Policy...
-
Anti-Tolling Coalition Responds to MassDOT's Call for Expanded Tolling
-
Repairs And Roast Beef Sandwich Sales Grow At Dodge City
-
What Is The Most Effective Award You’ve Given You Staff To Drive...
-
The Power of Knowledge
-
You Can Make the Right Choice
-
How Do You Combat Shrinkage in Your Store?
-
What's In It For Me?
-
How Do You Keep Your Management Interested in the Business?
-
Let Freedom Ring!
Quick Links
How NLRB's McDonald's Ruling Could Affect Franchise Relationships
August 15, 2014
The National Labor Relations Board’s recent ruling that McDonald’s can be held liable for labor violations by its franchise operators could have significant ramifications for businesses on both ends of a franchise relationship if upheld by the courts.
According to an analysis by NATSO’s legal counsel, the July 29 NLRB ruling that McDonald’s is the joint employer of its franchisees’ employees stands to set a new legal precedent regarding the degree to which franchisors are liable for franchisee employees. The rule could ease the way for the formation of national unions by franchisee employees that would be their exclusive agent for collective bargaining purposes.
In the petroleum industry, there are numerous business relationships that could be affected if the ruling stands. Whenever refiners or truck stop chains authorize franchisees to use their brands in connection with the sale of motor fuels, they risk “joint employer” status if the extent of their control of franchisee operations is deemed to meaningfully affect the essential working conditions of the franchisee’s employees. In addition, the numerous truck stop and c-store operators that operate quick-serve restaurant and other franchises could face increased wage and benefit scales as national unions gain a foothold in the industry.
The general counsel of the NLRB ruled July 29 that McDonald’s Corp. is liable for labor and wage violations by its franchise operators. McDonald’s has said that it will contest the decision before an Administrative Law Judge. If that judge upholds the decision, the issue would likely be taken to court and the appellate process could take years.
Furthermore if upheld by the courts, small businesses ultimately could become responsible as joint employers for providing worker benefits such as medical insurance to the employees of the franchisee if employee numbers are counted on an aggregate basis.
While the NLRB decision is currently confined to McDonald's, it could prompt other federal agencies to follow suit and hold franchisors liable for regulatory violations by their franchisees.
NATSO will continue to follow developments in the case, and will keep members updated.
NATSO has developed a document detailing the NLRB’s ruling as well as general guidelines to help petroleum marketers avoid joint-employer status in their dealer/franchise agreements. To request a copy of the document, please click here.
Tiffany Wlazlowski Neuman
- Source:
- Web-Only Content
More on Labor
- NATSO Comments on Reexamination of Joint Employer Standard
- Federal Appeals Court Rules on Joint Employer Case
- NLRB Proposes New Joint Employer Standard
- Labor Update: DOL Rescinds Persuader Rule, NLRB Rejects Joint Employer Settlement
- NLRB Chairman Sets Timeline for Joint Employer Rulemaking
- National Labor Relations Board Vacates Joint Employer Decision Amid Controversy
Tell Us What You Think