Quick Links
-
North Carolina Transportation Committee Approves Bill Limiting Tolls
-
NATSO Tells Congress: Fuel Taxes Efficient, Tolls Are Not
-
Broadway Flying J Celebrates 50 Years of Extra Mile Service
-
Rep. McMorris Rodgers Says Gas Tax Increase 'Tough Sell'
-
Sen. Lautenberg Legislation Would Extend Truck Size and Weight...
-
Rep. Goodlatte Introduces Legislation to Eliminate RFS
-
Minnesota Senate Votes to Increase Gas Tax
-
MoDOT Converts Rest Areas to Truck Parking Only Facilities
-
Orion Food Systems President Steve Watkins Joins Trade Delegation...
-
South Carolina Latest State To Seek to Tie Gas Tax to Inflation
No articles are featured in this category.
-
The Power of Knowledge
-
You Can Make the Right Choice
-
How Do You Combat Shrinkage in Your Store?
-
What's In It For Me?
-
How Do You Keep Your Management Interested in the Business?
-
Let Freedom Ring!
-
Great Ideas in Action: Share Your Fourth of July Retail Display
-
May Card Spending 'Healthy'
-
NATSO’s New Website
-
Big Cabin Travel Plaza Still Thrives after 57 Years
- Home
- Credit/Debit Fees
- NATSO Joins Retail Groups Asking Congress to Reject Claims by Visa, MasterCard
NATSO Joins Retail Groups Asking Congress to Reject Claims by Visa, MasterCard
September 24, 2012
In a letter sent to House and Senate leaders last Thursday, NATSO joined a group of associations representing retailers to highlight the reasons behind the growing opposition to the proposed settlement of the long-standing antitrust lawsuit filed by merchants against Visa, MasterCard and the nation’s largest banks. The associations urged Congress to reject the false claims from the card networks writing that the proposed settlement does nothing to resolve the failures in the electronic payment market.
“The proposed settlement, which was negotiated by Visa, MasterCard and lawyers purporting to represent the merchant community, is one-sided and preserves the very anticompetitive actions that were the genesis of the lawsuits. Quite simply, the proposed settlement is a bad deal for merchants and their customers,” wrote the organizations.
Among the many reasons cited for their objections is that the settlement:
- Entrenches the Visa/MasterCard duopoly,
- Enables continued centralized price-fixing by Visa and MasterCard,
- Allows Visa and MasterCard to continue to handcuff merchants and prevent them from seeking better deals and communicating openly with their customers,
- Forbids merchants from opting out of restrictive new rules set forth in the proposal,
- Gives Visa and MasterCard the ability to keep market forces from working by keeping prices hidden,
- Makes all current and future merchants – even those that are not yet in existence - forever surrender their legal rights, and
- Limits emerging innovations that can bring meaningful competition to the marketplace, such as mobile payments.
NATSO signed onto the letter, along with NACS, National Association of College Stores, National Community Pharmacists Association, National Cooperative Grocers Association, National Grocers Association, National Retail Federation, Retail Industry Leaders Association and the Society of Independent Gasoline Marketers of America.
- Source:
- NATSO News Weekly (NNW)
More on Credit/Debit Fees
- Merchants Criticize Federal Reserve Decision to Maintain Interchange Fee Standards
- Credit Card Settlement - Important Considerations for NATSO Members
- Credit Card Settlement Appeal Delayed Until Fall
- Judge Denies Request to Block Preliminary Approval of Swipe Fee Settlement
- NATSO, Other Plaintiffs to Appeal Swipe Fee Settlement
- Swipe Fee Settlement is Granted Preliminary Approval
Tell Us What You Think